header-logo header-logo

29 August 2023
Issue: 8038 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Legal services
printer mail-detail

Be prompt & watch your tone, says LSB

Solicitors, barristers and other lawyers could be required to provide complaints information to clients at repeated intervals during the working relationship, under Legal Services Board (LSB) proposals.

Current professional rules state this information should be given at the time of instruction. The LSB proposes that lawyers be required to acknowledge receipt of complaints within five working days, provide updates on progress of the complaint and use ‘plain and appropriate language… to address the perceived power imbalance that may arise’. Communications should also be ‘empathetic’, since anecdotal evidence reported lawyers responding with ‘cold’ and ‘dismissive’ language. The LSB notes the Legal Ombudsman (LeO) has observed language and tone as ‘a potential weak spot in first-tier complaints handling’.

The LSB, which regulates all eight branches of the legal profession, launched a consultation last week intent on tightening up ‘first-tier’ complaints procedures, where a client complains directly to the service provider rather than a regulatory body.

According to the LSB consultation paper, a ‘sizeable proportion’ of clients are ‘silent sufferers’, dissatisfied with the service they receive yet reluctant to complain because they believe it will be ‘an arduous process’ and their complaint won’t be taken seriously anyway. The LSB notes this problem is amplified where the client is in vulnerable circumstances, notably immigration and asylum clients.

LeO reported in its annual complaints summaries for 2019-20 and 2020-2021 that it found first-tier complaints handling ‘inadequate’ in about a quarter of cases investigated, with providers not responding or not responding within the eight-week time limit, or not addressing all the issues raised.

Richard Orpin, director of regulation and policy at the LSB, said: ‘Our proposals are designed to support a culture in which the sector responds positively and proactively to complaints, and embraces consumer feedback to learn lessons and raise standards.’

The consultation ends on 17 November 2023.

Issue: 8038 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Legal services
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll