header-logo header-logo

Pensions: benefits in doubt?

27 September 2024 / Dipti Hunter , Alex Akin
Issue: 8087 / Categories: Features , Profession , Pensions , Employment
printer mail-detail
190800
A BBC pensions case earlier this year considered the power of amendment, in particular the term ‘interest’. Dipti Hunter & Alex Akin explain the details
  • The Court of Appeal recently reviewed the amendment power in a BBC pension case, confirming the decision of the High Court that future service benefits are protected.
  • Those hoping for a more liberal approach to interpretation may be disappointed, but the Court of Appeal confirmed an ‘even-handed’ approach is required.

As pension benefits become harder to manage for stakeholders, companies and trustees are continually looking at how they manage the potential demands on their pension schemes. The judgment in British Broadcasting Corp v BBC Pension Trust Ltd and another [2024] EWCA Civ 767, [2024] All ER (D) 54 (Jul) was handed down earlier this year, part of a trend of pension schemes being sold to insurance underwriters so that employers may release themselves from overly burdensome schemes. Pensions litigation quite often comes with a great deal of history attached and this case

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll