header-logo header-logo

27 September 2024 / Dipti Hunter , Alex Akin
Issue: 8087 / Categories: Features , Profession , Pensions , Employment
printer mail-detail

Pensions: benefits in doubt?

190800
A BBC pensions case earlier this year considered the power of amendment, in particular the term ‘interest’. Dipti Hunter & Alex Akin explain the details
  • The Court of Appeal recently reviewed the amendment power in a BBC pension case, confirming the decision of the High Court that future service benefits are protected.
  • Those hoping for a more liberal approach to interpretation may be disappointed, but the Court of Appeal confirmed an ‘even-handed’ approach is required.

As pension benefits become harder to manage for stakeholders, companies and trustees are continually looking at how they manage the potential demands on their pension schemes. The judgment in British Broadcasting Corp v BBC Pension Trust Ltd and another [2024] EWCA Civ 767, [2024] All ER (D) 54 (Jul) was handed down earlier this year, part of a trend of pension schemes being sold to insurance underwriters so that employers may release themselves from overly burdensome schemes. Pensions litigation quite often comes with a great deal of history attached and this case

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll