header-logo header-logo

Next steps in countdown to Brexit

07 October 2019
Issue: 7859 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-detail
Parliament has been suspended again as a weakened Prime Minister contends with the rejection of his Brexit deal proposals and a fast-brewing scandal over alleged impropriety during his time as London Mayor.

Prime Minister Boris Johnson has been telephoning EU leaders to discuss the potential for securing a deal, after the European Parliament dismissed his latest plans as unworkable last week. At home, he faces allegations of favouritism during his tenure as London Mayor over grants and places on international trade delegations given to US businesswoman Jennifer Arcuri. Inquiries into the allegations have been launched by the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, the London Mayor and the London Assembly’s oversight committee.

Meanwhile, the Inner House of the Court of Session in Scotland is considering whether a court can sign an Art 50 extension request in the place of Johnson should he refuse to do so. This procedure, which is unique to Scots law, is known as ‘petitioning the nobile officium’. Johnson is compelled to seek an extension until 31 January 2020 unless a deal has been agreed by 19 October, under the Benn Act (otherwise known as the European Union (Withdrawal) (No 2) Act 2019).

Lord Carloway, the Lord President, has said the issues are so significant and time-sensitive that the court will not give its decision until 21 October, after the 19 October deadline has passed.

Last week, the Outer House rejected the petition. Delivering his judgment, Lord Pentland said he was ‘not satisfied that the petitioners have made out their case based on reasonable apprehension of breach of statutory duty on the part of the Prime Minister’. During the case, Aidan O’Neill QC, on behalf of petitioners Dale Vince, Jolyon Maugham QC and Joanna Cherry QC MP, cited press reports quoting ‘Number 10 sources’ which, he said, indicated government policy was to frustrate the legislation. However, papers submitted by the government to the court stated that Johnson would comply with the Benn Act.

Parliament was prorogued after close of business on 8 October. A Queen’s Speech is scheduled for 14 October, curtailing all Bills not passed during this session apart from the Domestic Abuse Bill, which will be carried over.  

Issue: 7859 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll