header-logo header-logo

07 October 2019
Issue: 7859 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Next steps in countdown to Brexit

Parliament has been suspended again as a weakened Prime Minister contends with the rejection of his Brexit deal proposals and a fast-brewing scandal over alleged impropriety during his time as London Mayor.

Prime Minister Boris Johnson has been telephoning EU leaders to discuss the potential for securing a deal, after the European Parliament dismissed his latest plans as unworkable last week. At home, he faces allegations of favouritism during his tenure as London Mayor over grants and places on international trade delegations given to US businesswoman Jennifer Arcuri. Inquiries into the allegations have been launched by the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, the London Mayor and the London Assembly’s oversight committee.

Meanwhile, the Inner House of the Court of Session in Scotland is considering whether a court can sign an Art 50 extension request in the place of Johnson should he refuse to do so. This procedure, which is unique to Scots law, is known as ‘petitioning the nobile officium’. Johnson is compelled to seek an extension until 31 January 2020 unless a deal has been agreed by 19 October, under the Benn Act (otherwise known as the European Union (Withdrawal) (No 2) Act 2019).

Lord Carloway, the Lord President, has said the issues are so significant and time-sensitive that the court will not give its decision until 21 October, after the 19 October deadline has passed.

Last week, the Outer House rejected the petition. Delivering his judgment, Lord Pentland said he was ‘not satisfied that the petitioners have made out their case based on reasonable apprehension of breach of statutory duty on the part of the Prime Minister’. During the case, Aidan O’Neill QC, on behalf of petitioners Dale Vince, Jolyon Maugham QC and Joanna Cherry QC MP, cited press reports quoting ‘Number 10 sources’ which, he said, indicated government policy was to frustrate the legislation. However, papers submitted by the government to the court stated that Johnson would comply with the Benn Act.

Parliament was prorogued after close of business on 8 October. A Queen’s Speech is scheduled for 14 October, curtailing all Bills not passed during this session apart from the Domestic Abuse Bill, which will be carried over.  

Issue: 7859 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll