header-logo header-logo

07 October 2019
Issue: 7859 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Next steps in countdown to Brexit

Parliament has been suspended again as a weakened Prime Minister contends with the rejection of his Brexit deal proposals and a fast-brewing scandal over alleged impropriety during his time as London Mayor.

Prime Minister Boris Johnson has been telephoning EU leaders to discuss the potential for securing a deal, after the European Parliament dismissed his latest plans as unworkable last week. At home, he faces allegations of favouritism during his tenure as London Mayor over grants and places on international trade delegations given to US businesswoman Jennifer Arcuri. Inquiries into the allegations have been launched by the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, the London Mayor and the London Assembly’s oversight committee.

Meanwhile, the Inner House of the Court of Session in Scotland is considering whether a court can sign an Art 50 extension request in the place of Johnson should he refuse to do so. This procedure, which is unique to Scots law, is known as ‘petitioning the nobile officium’. Johnson is compelled to seek an extension until 31 January 2020 unless a deal has been agreed by 19 October, under the Benn Act (otherwise known as the European Union (Withdrawal) (No 2) Act 2019).

Lord Carloway, the Lord President, has said the issues are so significant and time-sensitive that the court will not give its decision until 21 October, after the 19 October deadline has passed.

Last week, the Outer House rejected the petition. Delivering his judgment, Lord Pentland said he was ‘not satisfied that the petitioners have made out their case based on reasonable apprehension of breach of statutory duty on the part of the Prime Minister’. During the case, Aidan O’Neill QC, on behalf of petitioners Dale Vince, Jolyon Maugham QC and Joanna Cherry QC MP, cited press reports quoting ‘Number 10 sources’ which, he said, indicated government policy was to frustrate the legislation. However, papers submitted by the government to the court stated that Johnson would comply with the Benn Act.

Parliament was prorogued after close of business on 8 October. A Queen’s Speech is scheduled for 14 October, curtailing all Bills not passed during this session apart from the Domestic Abuse Bill, which will be carried over.  

Issue: 7859 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Family law must shift from conflict-driven litigation to child-centred problem-solving, according to a major new report. Writing in NLJ this week, Caroline Bowden of Anthony Gold outlines findings showing overwhelming support for reform, with 92% agreeing lawyers owe duties to children as well as clients
back-to-top-scroll