header-logo header-logo

04 February 2026
Issue: 8148 / Categories: Legal News , Wills & Probate , Pensions , Inheritance tax
printer mail-detail

Bereaved face extra costs under draft Bill

Peers have warned impending legislation could put executors at financial risk when their loved ones die

The Finance Bill 2025-26 will bring most unused pension funds and death benefits within the scope of a person’s estate for inheritance tax purposes in 2027. Personal representatives (PRs)—executors and administrators—will be liable for reporting and paying any inheritance tax due on these funds and benefits.

The reform aims to tackle the use of pension schemes for tax avoidance purposes. In its report on the Bill last week, however, the House of Lords Finance Bill sub-committee recommended the payment deadline be extended from six to twelve months, and the government introduce safe-harbour periods for late interest payments where PRs are not at fault for missing deadlines. The sub-committee also urges the government to raise awareness of the reforms, produce practical guidance and support for those affected, and monitor the long-term impact, in its report, ‘Inheritance tax measures: unused pension funds and agricultural and business property reliefs’.

Lord Liddle, chair of the sub-committee, said: ‘The practical issues created by bringing pensions into inheritance tax risk causing significant delays and costs. Moreover, many of those affected may be entirely unaware of how these changes will impact them.’

The peers’ concerns echo those raised by the Law Society last year when the Bill was published. It warned PRs would be responsible for assets such as pensions or death benefits, yet have no control over those assets, and could be liable for inheritance tax on assets that had already been spent or were difficult to recover. Moreover, family and friends may no longer want to act as PRs.

Law Society vice president Brett Dixon said this week: ‘We are pleased that the House of Lord’s Finance Bill Subcommittee has listened to evidence from stakeholders, including the Law Society.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll