header-logo header-logo

22 April 2020
Issue: 7884 / Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail

Berkeley Rowe—Akbar Ali

Firm expands team with new corporate partner

Specialist commercial and corporate law firm Berkeley Rowe has announced the appointment of Akbar Ali as a partner and head of corporate.

Akbar will be based in the firm’s London office in Mayfair. He has many years of experience as a mergers & acquisitions lawyer and joins from a highly reputable law firm where he was also head of corporate. Akbar has a wealth of international experience, having worked for a leading global US-based law firm, as well as in-house at a Swiss corporate.

His principal focus at Berkeley Rowe will be expanding and developing the established corporate practice while evolving the team by targeting niche areas including capital markets and international cross-border transactions. Akbar is sector agnostic and has worked on deals from £1m to hundreds of millions.

Akbar will also undertake general commercial work including franchise arrangements, terms and conditions, banking and finance, legal opinions and more.

Tom Keya, chief executive officer, Berkeley Rowe, said: ‘Corporate is an area that is rapidly expanding in our practice and I am excited to have Akbar Ali on board to lead it. We have acted on a number of complex and interesting reported corporate and commercial matters in the past few years. His talent and results-led approach enabled him to have a swift rise to become head of department and leading a team specialising in M&A at his previous firm. He brings with him this wealth of experience, a high level of energy and dynamic approach that has made Berkeley Rowe stand out among our peers.’

Akbar Ali, commented: ‘I am excited to be joining the team at Berkeley Rowe and feel that my experience complements the firm’s innovative approach to corporate transactions and ambitious plans for the future. I am looking forward to working with and growing the department into new exciting areas.’

Issue: 7884 / Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll