header-logo header-logo

Best person for the job?

28 March 2013 / Martin Burns
Issue: 7554 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Martin Burns highlights the benefits of appointing a commercial mediator

There is no doubt that mediation of commercial disputes is on the government agenda, and its promise to reduce costs and promote consensus is genuinely attractive. But is mediation ever going to really stack up as a viable alternative to the courts?

The problem for mediation is that it has not been properly embraced by lawyers and used as a matter of routine. The history of mediation in the UK over the past 20 years suggests this is not going to happen anytime soon.

Lawyers know how to litigate. It is what they are trained to do. The courts are their comfort zone. Litigation is the lawyer’s natural state of mind and it is normal for them to advise their clients to litigate rather than mediate. It is also understandable that lawyers who act as mediators will often struggle to move out of an adversarial mindset, and find it difficult to adopt an approach that is all about patiently facilitating an amicable

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll