header-logo header-logo

Better together?

05 January 2018 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7775 / Categories: Features , Discrimination
printer mail-detail
nlj_7775_piggott

Charles Pigott talks gender segregation & discrimination, & considers what we can learn from the Al-Hijrah school case

  • The Court of Appeal has ruled that gender segregation at a single site mixed school was direct sex discrimination.
  • However the majority stopped short of holding that such segregation was inherently discriminatory against women and girls.

The Court of Appeal’s decision in HM Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills v The Interim Executive Board of Al-Hijrah School and others [2017] EWCA Civ 1426 identifies head on some difficult issues of discrimination law arising from the segregation of school pupils on religious grounds.

Al-Hijrah school is a voluntary aided faith school for boys and girls aged from four to 16. Although operating on a single site, it has followed the practice of educating boys and girls separately from Year Five onwards. The question before the Court of Appeal was whether this practice amounted to direct discrimination on grounds of sex.

History of the litigation

The story starts with an Ofsted inspection report

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hill Dickinson—Paul Matthews, Liz Graham & Sarah Pace

Hill Dickinson—Paul Matthews, Liz Graham & Sarah Pace

Leeds office strengthened with triple partner hire

Clarke Willmott—Oksana Howard

Clarke Willmott—Oksana Howard

Corporate lawyer joins as partner in London office

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll