header-logo header-logo

05 January 2018 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7775 / Categories: Features , Discrimination
printer mail-detail

Better together?

nlj_7775_piggott

Charles Pigott talks gender segregation & discrimination, & considers what we can learn from the Al-Hijrah school case

  • The Court of Appeal has ruled that gender segregation at a single site mixed school was direct sex discrimination.
  • However the majority stopped short of holding that such segregation was inherently discriminatory against women and girls.

The Court of Appeal’s decision in HM Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills v The Interim Executive Board of Al-Hijrah School and others [2017] EWCA Civ 1426 identifies head on some difficult issues of discrimination law arising from the segregation of school pupils on religious grounds.

Al-Hijrah school is a voluntary aided faith school for boys and girls aged from four to 16. Although operating on a single site, it has followed the practice of educating boys and girls separately from Year Five onwards. The question before the Court of Appeal was whether this practice amounted to direct discrimination on grounds of sex.

History of the litigation

The story starts with an Ofsted inspection report

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll