header-logo header-logo

Between a rock and a hard place

11 August 2011 / Vanessa Van Breda , Mark Surguy
Issue: 7478 / Categories: Features , E-disclosure , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Vanessa van Breda & Mark Surguy approach the conflicting forces of duty & disclosure

A solicitor has duties to his client and the court during the disclosure process. Increasingly a tension occurs between the two, especially as in-house counsel seeks to control more of the process to manage costs This article explores the tensions in the light of Common Market Commercial Services AVV (CMCS) v Taylor and Taylor v Stoutt, CMCS and Jakober [2011] EWHC 324 (Ch), [2011] All ER (D) 269 (Feb) (CMCS).

Brief facts of CMCS

The proceedings arose out of a dispute over the beneficial ownership of a property following a divorce. The property was owned by a Netherlands Antilles bearer share company owned or controlled by a Swiss national living in Geneva.

The company sought possession of the property and the wife sought a transfer to herself on the basis that the funds to acquire the property came from the husband. She sought disclosure from the Swiss national in order to prove

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll