header-logo header-logo

11 August 2011 / Vanessa Van Breda , Mark Surguy
Issue: 7478 / Categories: Features , E-disclosure , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Between a rock and a hard place

Vanessa van Breda & Mark Surguy approach the conflicting forces of duty & disclosure

A solicitor has duties to his client and the court during the disclosure process. Increasingly a tension occurs between the two, especially as in-house counsel seeks to control more of the process to manage costs This article explores the tensions in the light of Common Market Commercial Services AVV (CMCS) v Taylor and Taylor v Stoutt, CMCS and Jakober [2011] EWHC 324 (Ch), [2011] All ER (D) 269 (Feb) (CMCS).

Brief facts of CMCS

The proceedings arose out of a dispute over the beneficial ownership of a property following a divorce. The property was owned by a Netherlands Antilles bearer share company owned or controlled by a Swiss national living in Geneva.

The company sought possession of the property and the wife sought a transfer to herself on the basis that the funds to acquire the property came from the husband. She sought disclosure from the Swiss national in order to prove

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll