header-logo header-logo

27 September 2012
Issue: 7531 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Beware the 13th!

July 13th is when disaster is most likely to strike, analysis of injury dates shows.

Lawyers at Edwards Hoyle studied case data from the last two years and concluded that July has been the worst month for personal injury, with 11 per cent of all cases taken on by the firm being in that month. Spookily, the most unsafe day for clients was 13 July.

 

  • The safest time of the year as far as personal injury is concerned was January, a month which accounts for just five per cent of injuries resulting in a claim taken on by the firm. 31 January was the safest day of the year.

    Unhappy birthdays are a rarity at the firm – less than 0.12 per cent of clients suffered their injury on their birthday.

David Edwards, managing partner, said: “We’ve often been asked if there’s a particular time of year, month or day in a week when personal injury most commonly occurs, so we thought it was about time we found out. Obviously, all personal injury cases are examples of misfortune and, more often than not, being in the wrong place at the wrong time, so it can happen anywhere and anytime.”

Issue: 7531 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll