header-logo header-logo

27 September 2012
Issue: 7531 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Beware the 13th!

July 13th is when disaster is most likely to strike, analysis of injury dates shows.

Lawyers at Edwards Hoyle studied case data from the last two years and concluded that July has been the worst month for personal injury, with 11 per cent of all cases taken on by the firm being in that month. Spookily, the most unsafe day for clients was 13 July.

 

  • The safest time of the year as far as personal injury is concerned was January, a month which accounts for just five per cent of injuries resulting in a claim taken on by the firm. 31 January was the safest day of the year.

    Unhappy birthdays are a rarity at the firm – less than 0.12 per cent of clients suffered their injury on their birthday.

David Edwards, managing partner, said: “We’ve often been asked if there’s a particular time of year, month or day in a week when personal injury most commonly occurs, so we thought it was about time we found out. Obviously, all personal injury cases are examples of misfortune and, more often than not, being in the wrong place at the wrong time, so it can happen anywhere and anytime.”

Issue: 7531 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers to be joined by leading family law set, 4 Brick Court, this summer

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Real estate and construction energy offering boosted by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Firm bolsters real estate team with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS
A wave of housing and procedural reforms is set to test the limits of tribunal capacity. In his latest Civil Way column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold charts sweeping change as the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 begins biting
Plans to reduce jury trials risk missing the real problem in the criminal justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, David Wolchover of Ridgeway Chambers argues the crown court backlog is fuelled not by juries but weak cases slipping through a flawed ‘50%’ prosecution test
Emerging technologies may soon transform how courts determine truth in deeply personal disputes. In this week's NLJ, Madhavi Kabra of 1 Hare Court and Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers explore how neurotechnology could reshape family law
A controversial protest case has reignited debate over the limits of free expression. In NLJ this week, Nicholas Dobson examines a Quran-burning incident testing public order law
The courts have drawn a firm line under attempts to extend arbitration appeals. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed of the University of Leicester highlights that if the High Court refuses permission under s 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996, that is the end
back-to-top-scroll