header-logo header-logo

Beware the 13th!

27 September 2012
Issue: 7531 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

July 13th is when disaster is most likely to strike, analysis of injury dates shows.

Lawyers at Edwards Hoyle studied case data from the last two years and concluded that July has been the worst month for personal injury, with 11 per cent of all cases taken on by the firm being in that month. Spookily, the most unsafe day for clients was 13 July.

 

  • The safest time of the year as far as personal injury is concerned was January, a month which accounts for just five per cent of injuries resulting in a claim taken on by the firm. 31 January was the safest day of the year.

    Unhappy birthdays are a rarity at the firm – less than 0.12 per cent of clients suffered their injury on their birthday.

David Edwards, managing partner, said: “We’ve often been asked if there’s a particular time of year, month or day in a week when personal injury most commonly occurs, so we thought it was about time we found out. Obviously, all personal injury cases are examples of misfortune and, more often than not, being in the wrong place at the wrong time, so it can happen anywhere and anytime.”

Issue: 7531 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll