header-logo header-logo

07 April 2011
Issue: 7460 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Beware of bribery

Cautious approach should be taken to new legislation

Lawyers are advising companies to take a “cautious approach” to the Bribery Act following the issuing of guidance last week by the Ministry of Justice on how companies can put “adequate procedures” in place to avoid prosecution.

The 2010 Act, due to come into force on 1 July 2011, creates a new offence of failure by a commercial organisation to prevent persons associated with it from bribing others on its behalf.

The guidance sets out some simple steps that can be taken to resolve bribery risks, and advises senior management to become personally involved in addressing these. As before, corporate hospitality will be allowed and “facilitation payments” will be unlawful.

Mathew Rutter, partner at Beachcroft, says it is important to bear in mind that “the wording of the Act itself is unchanged, and this guidance does not create a safe harbour”.

Sam Eastwood, partner at Norton Rose LLP, says: “The guidance may have limited weight in the English courts—the guidance does not have the force of law and can be revised by the secretary of state at any time.

“The ultimate effect of the Act will depend on how it is interpreted by prosecutors and, ultimately, the courts, and there remains a risk that they will take a stricter line on some issues like ‘associated persons’ or the territorial scope of the Act.”

Ed Crosse, partner at Osborne Clarke, says that for the majority of ethical businesses, adopting a common sense, proportionate and risk based approach should address their obligations. “However, if companies operating in high risk sectors or jurisdictions fail to protect themselves by properly assessing the risks presented by their business, they will be seriously exposed under the new regime.”

Last week, the director of public prosecutions and the director of the Serious Fraud Office also jointly issued guidance for prosecutors on how to decide whether to bring a prosecution.

Issue: 7460 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll