header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

Beware the boilerplates!

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
26 April 2024 / Andrew Francis
Issue: 8068 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Property , Contract
printer mail-detail
169188
Andrew Francis on the application of three important principles advising upon the meaning & effect of legal documents
  • Covers Mackenzie v Cheung [2024], with lessons on interpretation and the dangers of boilerplate terms.
  • Notes important principles applicable to the interpretation of powers to vary rights at a future date.

The judgment of the Court of Appeal delivered on 17 January 2024 in Mackenzie v Cheung and another [2024] EWCA Civ 13, [2024] All ER (D) 64 (Jan) is an example of the application of three important principles when we are advising upon the meaning and effect of legal documents. First, for nearly 30 years the principles of construction of documents (set out on more than one occasion by the Supreme Court and its predecessors) require us not only to look at the language of the document, but also at the objective intentions of the parties and the context in which it is found. Second, previous decisions of the courts on words which are under scrutiny in the present case may not

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Firm promotes London international arbitration specialist to partnership

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Firm bolsters restructuring practice with senior London hires

HFW—Guy Marrison

HFW—Guy Marrison

Global aviation disputes practice boosted by London partner hire

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: The insider returns
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
NLJ this week: Drawing the line on contempt
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
NLJ this week: Stop and search by the numbers
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
NLJ this week: Looking back on the prorogation that never was
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
NLJ this week: How not to plead a schedule of loss
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll