header-logo header-logo

19 December 2018
Issue: 7822 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Beware the whistle-blowers

Businesses have been hit by a confusion of whistle-blowers over data breaches since the introduction of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in May.

The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO), which is actively encouraging whistle-blowers to come forward, received 82 reports in the three months after the GDPR took effect, a rise of 165% on the 31 made in the previous three months.

Whistle-blower testimony was an important part of the Cambridge Analytica case.

GDPR fines can be as high as €20m (about £17.8m) or 4% of worldwide turnover of the entity. This is more than 35 times higher than the old maximum fine of £500,000.

Recent research by City law firm RPC found the average value of an ICO fine had doubled to £146,000 in 2017-18, up from £73,000. Insurance against data breaches is one of the fastest growing areas of the insurance industry.

Richard Breavington, RPC partner, said: ‘Data breaches are now regularly headline news stories and that means more whistle-blowers coming forward.

‘It is not just disgruntled employees who act as whistle-blowers, but genuinely concerned individuals. With that increased pressure, along with the new responsibilities from GDPR, businesses need to have the right security protections and procedures in place or face potentially significant consequences if there is a data breach.

‘Businesses need to ensure, for instance, that their cyber insurance policies have access to the experts needed to contain any data breach and limit its potential impact.’

Issue: 7822 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll