header-logo header-logo

03 May 2012 / Jeremy Hill
Issue: 7512 / Categories: Features , Profession , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Bidding for success

Jeremy Hill reviews the new “eBay for lawyers”

With referral fees set to be banned in personal injury (PI) cases, some law firms operating in this field are currently faced with a crisis in confidence in the viability of their own business models. If the ban becomes law as expected in April 2013, PI firms are faced not only with the spectre of having no access to the bulk referral lists they had previously purchased from claims managers, but also the advent of a liberalised legal services market that will sees brands such as The Co-operative and QualitySolicitors hoover up market share in the sector.

The choice is yours

The existing law firms have a choice: they either get picked up on the cheap by claims managers and brokers looking to build integrated claims management businesses, or they pay extortionate annual fees to join with a high-street brand in the hope they can continue to survive. Either way, the referral system as they currently experience it is lost to them forever.

It

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll