header-logo header-logo

The big freeze

05 May 2015 / Jon Lord
Categories: Opinion , Costs , Budgeting
printer mail-detail

Freezing hourly rates may hinder access to justice, says Jon Lord

The Master of the Rolls, Lord Dyson, has finally dampened the fire that has been the discussion as to whether the guideline hourly rates should go up or down by concluding, after discussions with the Law Society, that there is insufficient data to move them at all and that there are insufficient funds to conduct the required research. To add insult to injury, he doubted whether there would be enough firms willing to participate in the research in any event.

Existing guideline hourly rates, which were last updated in 2010, will therefore remain relevant, he said, for the foreseeable future, without giving any indication as to how far into the future his crystal ball can see.

Practical implications

At least we now know where we stand but what are the practical implications of that decision?

At the top end, it is unlikely to make any discernible difference. Complex commercial City litigation left guideline

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll