header-logo header-logo

05 May 2015 / Jon Lord
Categories: Opinion , Costs , Budgeting
printer mail-detail

The big freeze

Freezing hourly rates may hinder access to justice, says Jon Lord

The Master of the Rolls, Lord Dyson, has finally dampened the fire that has been the discussion as to whether the guideline hourly rates should go up or down by concluding, after discussions with the Law Society, that there is insufficient data to move them at all and that there are insufficient funds to conduct the required research. To add insult to injury, he doubted whether there would be enough firms willing to participate in the research in any event.

Existing guideline hourly rates, which were last updated in 2010, will therefore remain relevant, he said, for the foreseeable future, without giving any indication as to how far into the future his crystal ball can see.

Practical implications

At least we now know where we stand but what are the practical implications of that decision?

At the top end, it is unlikely to make any discernible difference. Complex commercial City litigation left guideline

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll