header-logo header-logo

The big freeze

05 May 2015 / Jon Lord
Categories: Opinion , Costs , Budgeting
printer mail-detail

Freezing hourly rates may hinder access to justice, says Jon Lord

The Master of the Rolls, Lord Dyson, has finally dampened the fire that has been the discussion as to whether the guideline hourly rates should go up or down by concluding, after discussions with the Law Society, that there is insufficient data to move them at all and that there are insufficient funds to conduct the required research. To add insult to injury, he doubted whether there would be enough firms willing to participate in the research in any event.

Existing guideline hourly rates, which were last updated in 2010, will therefore remain relevant, he said, for the foreseeable future, without giving any indication as to how far into the future his crystal ball can see.

Practical implications

At least we now know where we stand but what are the practical implications of that decision?

At the top end, it is unlikely to make any discernible difference. Complex commercial City litigation left guideline

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll