header-logo header-logo

The bigger picture

16 November 2012 / Ruth Daniel
Issue: 7538 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

Ruth Daniel highlights the importance of pro bono work following recent legal reform

The principle of access to justice is of central importance to a just society in which those deserving of a legal remedy can access a court in which that remedy can be delivered. Unfortunately, a lack of resources means that such access is not always available to those who need representation.

Government cuts in funding have amplified this lack of resources and, although pro bono cannot be a substitute for legal aid, those who work in the pro bono sector, or who campaign to broaden access to justice, are fulfiling an important role in helping those who cannot afford legal representation.

Cross-profession initiative

Established in 2008, the Access to Justice Foundation is a cross-profession initiative that provides funding and support to charities that give free legal help to those in need. Working closely with the pro bono and advice sector, the foundation raises funds through a variety of schemes and distributes those funds to organisations and projects that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll