header-logo header-logo

Biological fathers seek contact

07 February 2013
Issue: 7547 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Groundbreaking case for men who father children with lesbian couples

Men who father children with a lesbian couple in a civil partnership can apply for contact rights, the High Court has held.

Since 2008, the biological father has had no legal status where the biological mother is in a civil partnership at the time of conception. The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008 put civil partners on an equal footing with married couples, giving the civil partner automatic parental rights.

In the first case of its kind last week, however, Mr Justice Baker dismissed arguments that a biological father should be refused permission to apply for an order for contact.

The case, Re G and Re Z [2013] EWHC 134 (Fam), involved a gay couple in a civil partnership and two lesbian couples in civil partnerships. They were all good friends and agreed to have children together. One of the men was the biological father of two children belonging to one lesbian couple, while his partner was the biological father of the child of the other lesbian couple.

The men claimed they had regular contact with the children until their friendship with the mothers broke down, although the extent of this contact was disputed. No formal or written agreement was ever made.

Delivering his judgment, Baker J said the fact the mothers in both cases chose friends to be known fathers was a relevant factor.

Mark Harper, partner at Withers, who acted pro bono for the father in Re G, said: “These cases recognise the importance of the biological link children have with their fathers.

“Despite fathers in these situations not being recognised as parents as a matter of law, if the facts justify it, they can apply to the court for their children to have contact with them. Any men or lesbian couples in these situations need a clear understanding of the complexity of the law and should enter into agreements before starting out on having a child.

“The judgment confirms that if a lesbian couple do not want their children to have a relationship with the father then it is best to seek IVF from a licensed clinic to have anonymous sperm donation, rather than a known father.”

Issue: 7547 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll