header-logo header-logo

Biological fathers seek contact

07 February 2013
Issue: 7547 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Groundbreaking case for men who father children with lesbian couples

Men who father children with a lesbian couple in a civil partnership can apply for contact rights, the High Court has held.

Since 2008, the biological father has had no legal status where the biological mother is in a civil partnership at the time of conception. The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008 put civil partners on an equal footing with married couples, giving the civil partner automatic parental rights.

In the first case of its kind last week, however, Mr Justice Baker dismissed arguments that a biological father should be refused permission to apply for an order for contact.

The case, Re G and Re Z [2013] EWHC 134 (Fam), involved a gay couple in a civil partnership and two lesbian couples in civil partnerships. They were all good friends and agreed to have children together. One of the men was the biological father of two children belonging to one lesbian couple, while his partner was the biological father of the child of the other lesbian couple.

The men claimed they had regular contact with the children until their friendship with the mothers broke down, although the extent of this contact was disputed. No formal or written agreement was ever made.

Delivering his judgment, Baker J said the fact the mothers in both cases chose friends to be known fathers was a relevant factor.

Mark Harper, partner at Withers, who acted pro bono for the father in Re G, said: “These cases recognise the importance of the biological link children have with their fathers.

“Despite fathers in these situations not being recognised as parents as a matter of law, if the facts justify it, they can apply to the court for their children to have contact with them. Any men or lesbian couples in these situations need a clear understanding of the complexity of the law and should enter into agreements before starting out on having a child.

“The judgment confirms that if a lesbian couple do not want their children to have a relationship with the father then it is best to seek IVF from a licensed clinic to have anonymous sperm donation, rather than a known father.”

Issue: 7547 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll