header-logo header-logo

12 February 2026
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail

Bird & Bird—Gordon Moir

London tech and comms team boosted by telecoms and regulatory hires

International law firm Bird & Bird has strengthened its London offering with the appointment of Gordon Moir as a partner in its tech & comms team. He joined on 28 January alongside his team, including legal director Marcus Bagnall, who starts on 16 February.

Moir is an internationally recognised expert in telecoms, regulatory and anti-trust matters, with more than 25 years’ experience across senior in-house and private practice roles. His practice spans telecoms regulation, competition law and strategic advisory work, including market access, next generation services, data protection, interception and cross-border issues, as well as legal frameworks affecting content broadcasting.

The team numbers six total, with five fee-earners and one legal support staff member joining the firm. It includes partner Gordon Moir and legal director Marcus Bagnall, with the full team in place by the end of March.

Ronald Hendrikx, co-head of the international tech & comms group, said: ‘Gordon’s market-leading reputation for telecoms regulatory and strategic advisory work makes him a natural fit to build on the existing strength of our global Tech & Comms Group.’ Phil Sherrell, head of the London office, added that his focus on telecoms regulatory, data protection and competition ‘fits well with our market-leading telecoms expertise’ and that ‘he will be a huge asset to our teams in London and internationally.’

Moir said: ‘I’m excited by the opportunities presented through being part of such an international and truly connected firm,’ adding: ‘I’m delighted to bring my regulatory and strategic advisory experience to such a strong telecoms team.’

Image caption (L-R): Ronald Hendrikx, co-head of Bird & Bird's global Tech & Comms group, Gordon Moir, and Graeme Maguire, partner in the Tech & Comms group.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll