header-logo header-logo

10 June 2010 / Michael Salter , Chris Bryden
Issue: 7421 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Birmingham CC: testing the water

Chris Bryden & Michael Salter explain why equal pay remains an unattained goal

Equal pay disputes in employment tribunals have in recent years gained a high profile, with, in particular, large employers such as the NHS (following its Agenda for Change programme) and city councils experiencing multiple claims, many of which are still being litigated, and are likely to be litigated for some considerable time. Of these the most prominent may well be the claims facing Birmingham City Council, the largest local authority employer in Western Europe, with more than 60,000 employees on its books.

At the end of April 2010 the employment tribunal in Birmingham rejected the defence of Birmingham City Council in a long running dispute about pay. The said defence was based upon the argument that there was a genuine material factor justifying the difference between the salaries received by around 4,000 female employees in around 50 different roles and various comparator groups of refuse workers, road workers road cleaners, and gardeners, some of whom, with bonuses and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
back-to-top-scroll