header-logo header-logo

Birmingham law centre closes

04 July 2013
Issue: 7567 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Sad day for access to justice campaign

Birmingham Law Centre closed its doors last week, following a long campaign to keep it open. The centre helped about 2,000 people each year and was Birmingham’s only community law centre. It is the only law centre in the 56-strong network to receive no local authority funding, and had struggled due to financial problems and the cuts to legal aid funding. A statement from the trustees said the centre had closed due to “irreconcilable cash-flow problems”, and thanked staff and volunteers for their hard work. The centre had five solicitors and 15 paralegal and support staff.

Issue: 7567 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll