header-logo header-logo

04 July 2013
Issue: 7567 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Birmingham law centre closes

Sad day for access to justice campaign

Birmingham Law Centre closed its doors last week, following a long campaign to keep it open. The centre helped about 2,000 people each year and was Birmingham’s only community law centre. It is the only law centre in the 56-strong network to receive no local authority funding, and had struggled due to financial problems and the cuts to legal aid funding. A statement from the trustees said the centre had closed due to “irreconcilable cash-flow problems”, and thanked staff and volunteers for their hard work. The centre had five solicitors and 15 paralegal and support staff.

Issue: 7567 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield welcomes new employment partner, Tom McLaughlin

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

National specialist pensions law firm strengthens team with three new appointments

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit appoints Christian Abletshauser to lead family law practice

NEWS
Burges Salmon appoints Benn Richards to strengthen Contentious Insolvency offering
A High Court decision has clarified that a home may be unfit for human habitation not only where conditions endanger health or safety, but also where they seriously undermine comfort and convenience

A longer time limit for employment tribunal claims, new charity law thresholds, property tribunal recruitment and appellate guidance on small-claims costs feature in the latest Civil Way round-up

A recent High Court ruling could make issue estoppel considerably more complex in cross-border litigation, requiring parties to consider the foreign law governing the underlying claim
The Supreme Court has overturned Cheshire West’s bright-line test for deprivation of liberty, replacing it with a broader, more contextual assessment that gives greater weight to an individual’s wishes, feelings and apparent consent
back-to-top-scroll