header-logo header-logo

23 September 2010 / John Benstead
Issue: 7434 / Categories: Features , Bribery , Practice areas , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Biting the bullet

John Benstead explains why industry needs to be armed & ready for the Bribery Act

The Ministry of Justice has announced that the Bribery Act 2010 will come into force in April 2011, one year after receiving royal assent. The Act overhauls the UK’s archaic corruption laws. A new corporate offence of failing to prevent bribery is created. The Act is certain to have a profound effect on how commercial organisations conduct their operations.

Corruption is currently governed by the Prevention of Corruption Acts 1889 to 1916. Legislation passed in a different era had, by the beginning of the 21st century, become inadequate and it was generally accepted that reform was necessary. The matter was brought to a head by the Serious Fraud Office’s (SFO) controversial decision to drop its criminal investigation into BAE Saudi arms deals. That decision resulted in widespread anger and indignation throughout the global anti-corruption community. This persuaded the government to bite the bullet and reform the law. The Bribery Act 2010, now generally regarded as being one of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll