header-logo header-logo

03 June 2010 / Julian Sidoli Del Ceno
Issue: 7420 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

A bitter harvest?

Julian Sidoli del Ceno considers the future of ongoing guarantees for landlords

The Landlord and Tenant (Covenants) Act 1995 (LT(C)A 1995) set out to limit a tenant’s liabilities to the landlord following assignation. Hitherto, a former tenant might find themselves liable for a subsequent tenant’s default even though they may have parted company from any interest in the property in question many years before and there may have been a number of subsequent assignations over which they themselves would have had no control or even knowledge. The concern over this unjust state of affairs stretches back many decades and was brought to the fore in the law commission’s report Landlord and Tenant Law: Privity of Contract and Estate (Law Com no 174 1988) which paved the way for the subsequent 1995 Act.

Baroness Hale, in a well-known statement said: “The mischief at which the commission’s recommendations were aimed was the continuation of a liability long after the parties had parted with their interests in the property to which it was related.” (Avonridge

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll