header-logo header-logo

03 June 2010 / Julian Sidoli Del Ceno
Issue: 7420 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

A bitter harvest?

Julian Sidoli del Ceno considers the future of ongoing guarantees for landlords

The Landlord and Tenant (Covenants) Act 1995 (LT(C)A 1995) set out to limit a tenant’s liabilities to the landlord following assignation. Hitherto, a former tenant might find themselves liable for a subsequent tenant’s default even though they may have parted company from any interest in the property in question many years before and there may have been a number of subsequent assignations over which they themselves would have had no control or even knowledge. The concern over this unjust state of affairs stretches back many decades and was brought to the fore in the law commission’s report Landlord and Tenant Law: Privity of Contract and Estate (Law Com no 174 1988) which paved the way for the subsequent 1995 Act.

Baroness Hale, in a well-known statement said: “The mischief at which the commission’s recommendations were aimed was the continuation of a liability long after the parties had parted with their interests in the property to which it was related.” (Avonridge

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson appoints Vicky Tomlinson as Head of Independent Health and Care

DWF—five appointments

DWF—five appointments

DWF further strengthens major injury and casualty offering with new partner and four directors from DAC Beachcroft

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis strengthens Grimsby child care team

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll