header-logo header-logo

A bitter harvest?

03 June 2010 / Julian Sidoli Del Ceno
Issue: 7420 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

Julian Sidoli del Ceno considers the future of ongoing guarantees for landlords

The Landlord and Tenant (Covenants) Act 1995 (LT(C)A 1995) set out to limit a tenant’s liabilities to the landlord following assignation. Hitherto, a former tenant might find themselves liable for a subsequent tenant’s default even though they may have parted company from any interest in the property in question many years before and there may have been a number of subsequent assignations over which they themselves would have had no control or even knowledge. The concern over this unjust state of affairs stretches back many decades and was brought to the fore in the law commission’s report Landlord and Tenant Law: Privity of Contract and Estate (Law Com no 174 1988) which paved the way for the subsequent 1995 Act.

Baroness Hale, in a well-known statement said: “The mischief at which the commission’s recommendations were aimed was the continuation of a liability long after the parties had parted with their interests in the property to which it was related.” (Avonridge

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll