header-logo header-logo

28 January 2016
Issue: 7684 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Black cabs: not so special

A stand-off over the shape of London taxi cabs has been resolved after the High Court followed previous dicta regarding the shape of Kit Kats.

London Taxi Company (LTC), which makes the Capital’s iconic black cabs, claimed for trade mark infringement and passing off against Frazer-Nash, which they accused of copying the shape of the black cab when designing the new zero-emissions London taxi, the Metrocab. However, Mr Justice Arnold rejected this allegation, finding a low degree of similarity between the new Metrocab and LTC’s cabs. He declared the trade mark claims invalid and/or not infringed on other grounds.

Simon Clark, head of intellectual property, Berwin Leighton Paisner, who acted for Frazer-Nash, says: “This case was the first opportunity for Mr Justice Arnold to apply his interpretation of the Court of Justice’s recent ruling in the Kit Kat case by finding that people did not perceive LTC’s taxis as originating from LTC because of their shape, as opposed to any other trade mark present, such as the badge on the front of their taxis.”

Issue: 7684 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll