header-logo header-logo

09 October 2008 / Roger Smith
Issue: 7340 / Categories: Opinion , Legal services
printer mail-detail

Blinded by statistics?

Roger Smith is bemused by the government’s inability to do basic maths

Speaking at a Labour party fringe meeting last month Jack Straw was unequivocal: “There are now three times as many lawyers in private practice, but paid for by the taxpayer, as there were three decades ago.” This statistic would be a startling revelation of how lawyers have benefited from legal aid but it seems incapable of proof and highly unlikely to be true.

Thirty years ago, legal aid statistics for the Crown Court were not co-ordinated with those for other cases. This makes it impossible to know how many lawyers in total were working in legal aid. Furthermore, statistics were never kept for the number of solicitors in receipt of legal aid. The unit of account was the solicitor’s offices to whom cheques were sent. We know that about 4,000 barristers received a cheque and 8,241 solicitors’ offices for non-Crown Court work in 1977–78. Alas, the Legal Services Commission now fills its annual reports with management tosh that does not reveal many useful

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll