header-logo header-logo

06 December 2007 / Kevin Rogers
Issue: 7300 / Categories: Features , Media
printer mail-detail

Bloggers beware!

How offensive can anonymous online bloggers be?
Kevin Rogers investigates

Sheffield Wednesday FC’s recent spat with a website owner raises some interesting issues in relation to the use of the internet for blogging purposes.
The use of online bulletin boards, chat rooms and blogs is rapidly increasing. The MySpace, YouTube and Facebook generation not only encourages people to blog, but also gives the impression that everybody is an expert on any given topic. Any blog provides the opportunity for a blogger to criticise, abuse, welcome or generally ramble on a subject. This decision, which went partly in the claimant’s favour, indicates that  just because anonymous bloggers publish their material online does not mean that they are above the law.

There are obviously broader problems—most notably jurisdictional in nature—when considering websites that have a significantly wider international reach. The claimants in this case are fortunate in that the subject matter is of relatively minimal interest outside of the UK and so any jurisdictional problems are likely to be minor, if they exist at all.

OWLSTALK

In

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Jonathan Askin

Hugh James—Jonathan Askin

London corporate and commercial team announces partner appointment

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Firm names partner as London office managing partner

Kingsley Napley—Jonathan Grimes

Kingsley Napley—Jonathan Grimes

Firm appoints new head of criminal litigation team

NEWS
Personal injury lawyers have welcomed a government U-turn on a ‘substantial prejudice’ defence that risked enabling defendants in child sexual abuse civil cases to have proceedings against them dropped
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll