header-logo header-logo

30 October 2019
Issue: 7862 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Family , Media
printer mail-detail

Blogging in court

Family court judges should assist court reporters where possible, Sir Andrew McFarlane, president of the Family Division has said.

While family proceedings are normally private, accredited reporters have been allowed to attend since 2010 unless the court directs otherwise. Since October 2018, under a pilot scheme, the category of ‘reporter’ has been extended to include legal bloggers as well as journalists. Strict reporting restrictions operate to protect against the identification of children and minors.

In guidance issued this week, Sir Andrew states: ‘Courts should be astute to assist reporters seeking to attend a hearing, or to relax reporting restrictions, and should provide them with relevant contact details of the court office, the judge’s clerk and the parties where requested (unless there is good reason not to do so).’

He advises that judges should, at the start of a hearing, ask the reporter if they wish to make an application.

Issue: 7862 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Family , Media
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll