header-logo header-logo

Bolt Burdon Kemp—Natasha Orr

06 October 2025
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail
Firm strengthens military claims team with senior associate hire

Bolt Burdon Kemp has appointed Natasha Orr as a senior associate in its military claims team. Orr joins from Slater and Gordon, where she led the firm’s military team, bringing over a decade of experience representing armed forces personnel in complex civil claims. She has acted in cases involving serious injuries such as non-freezing cold injuries, noise-induced hearing loss, and PTSD, and is also a specialist in industrial disease claims, including asbestos exposure and occupational cancer matters.

Orr, who comes from an armed forces background, began her legal career in 2012 and has developed particular expertise in the Armed Forces Compensation Scheme (AFCS) and the specialist benefits and pensions available to service personnel. Her deep understanding of the challenges faced by the military community underpins her client-focused and compassionate approach to litigation.

Head of military claims Ahmed Al-Nahhas said: ‘Natasha truly understands the world that our clients are operating in and, as a highly skilled litigator, she has extensive experience in handling complex and high value claims. She provides meaningful and compassionate advice that can change lives for the better.’ He added that her expertise in industrial disease will ‘further strengthen our growing military team’.

Orr said: ‘Supporting the military community is hugely important to me, and I’m excited to join a firm that works tirelessly in doing so. Our armed forces make countless sacrifices, and it’s this greater understanding that drives me to deliver the outstanding service that members of the military community deserve.’ She added that she looks forward to working ‘within a team and a community that understands the needs, challenges, and problems that members of our armed forces face’.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Sian Langer & Gemma Parker

Clyde & Co—Sian Langer & Gemma Parker

Firm strengthens catastrophic injury capability with partner promotions

DWF—Dean Gormley

DWF—Dean Gormley

Finance and restructuring team offering expands in Manchester with partner hire

Taylor Rose—Vicki Maflin

Taylor Rose—Vicki Maflin

Firm announces appointment of head of remortgage

NEWS
The long-awaited Getty Images v Stability AI judgment arrived at the end of last year—but not with the seismic impact many expected. In this week's issue of NLJ, experts from Arnold & Porter dissect a ruling that is ‘historic’ yet tightly confined
The UK Supreme Court may be deciding fewer cases, but its impact in 2025 was anything but muted. In this week's NLJ, Professor Emeritus Brice Dickson of Queen’s University Belfast reviews a year marked by historically low output, a striking rise in jointly authored judgments, and a continued decline in dissent. High-profile rulings on biological sex under the Equality Act, public access to Dartmoor, and fairness in sexual offence trials ensured the court’s voice carried far beyond the Strand
Delays at HM Land Registry are no longer a background irritation but a growing source of professional risk. Writing in NLJ this week, Phil Murrin of DAC Beachcroft explores how the ‘registration gap’—now stretching up to two years in complex cases—is fuelling client frustration, priority disputes, and negligence claims
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
back-to-top-scroll