Bonfire of the quangos

12 February 2010 / Dr Jon Robins

Issue: 7404 / Categories: Opinion , Legal services

Another review and another nail banged into the coffin of the Legal Services Commission (LSC).

Another review and another nail banged into the coffin of the Legal Services Commission (LSC). This time it is a damaging report from House of Commons’ public accounts committee which last week accused the LSC of “poor oversight” and “uncertainty and duplication” between its role and that of the Ministry of Justice (MoJ). Before Christmas another watchdog, the National Audit Office, blamed the beleaguered body for allowing lawyers to “exploit” legal aid and over-paying them £25m.

This provides the background for Sir Ian Magee’s review of the “delivery” of legal aid presently with ministers. It’s hard to resist the analysis that, if Labour doesn’t bin the LSC first, then should the Tories win the election, it will go straight on the top of their “bonfire of the quangos”.

So how should legal aid lawyers view the passing of an agency that has come to be their bête noire? “Scrapping the LSC” entails a number of possible outcomes.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

Bonfire of the quangos

Another review and another nail banged into the coffin of the Legal Services Commission (LSC).

So how should legal aid lawyers view the passing of an agency that has come to be their bête noire? “Scrapping the LSC” entails a number of possible outcomes.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

SourceURL:

Links:

E-newsletter Sign-Up

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All

Russell-Cooke—Susanna Heley

Legal director appointment bolsters public and regulatory team

Slater Heelis—five appointments

Firm appoints training partner and four new trainees

Bolt Burdon Kemp—Natasha Orr

Firm strengthens military claims team with senior associate hire

NEWS

Read All

NLJ this week: AI, liberty & the digital cage

Government plans for offender ‘restriction zones’ risk creating ‘digital cages’ that blur punishment with surveillance, warns Henrietta Ronson, partner at Corker Binning, in this week's issue of NLJ

NLJ this week: Leasehold reform in limbo

Louise Uphill, senior associate at Moore Barlow LLP, dissects the faltering rollout of the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 in this week's NLJ

NLJ this week: Enforcement reform gets real

Judgments are ‘worthless without enforcement’, says HHJ Karen Walden-Smith, senior circuit judge and chair of the Civil Justice Council’s enforcement working group. In this week's NLJ, she breaks down the CJC’s April 2025 report, which identified systemic flaws and proposed 39 reforms, from modernising procedures to protecting vulnerable debtors

NLJ this week: Standish reshapes family & inheritance claims

Writing in NLJ this week, Katherine Harding and Charlotte Finley of Penningtons Manches Cooper examine Standish v Standish [2025] UKSC 26, the Supreme Court ruling that narrowed what counts as matrimonial property, and its potential impact upon claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975

NLJ this week: Clearing Christine Keeler’s name

In this week's NLJ, Dr Jon Robins, editor of The Justice Gap and lecturer at Brighton University, reports on a campaign to posthumously exonerate Christine Keeler. 60 years after her perjury conviction, Keeler’s son Seymour Platt has petitioned the king to exercise the royal prerogative of mercy, arguing she was a victim of violence and moral hypocrisy, not deceit. Supported by Felicity Gerry KC, the dossier brands the conviction 'the ultimate in slut-shaming'

Error message

Bonfire of the quangos

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Russell-Cooke—Susanna Heley

Slater Heelis—five appointments

Bolt Burdon Kemp—Natasha Orr