header-logo header-logo

12 August 2020 / Harry Potter
Categories: Features , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Book review: Anglo-American Law: A Comparison

"As much an argument as a disquisition, and full of amusing asides, it pulls no punches about the danger of judicial activism..."

Author: Michael Arnheim
Publisher: Talbot Publishing
ISBN: 9781616196325
Price: £70 hb, £7.98 ebook

From the author of The US Constitution for Dummies, this book is in similar vein and covers some of the same material. It provides a comparative overview of the legal systems in England and America, accompanied by many analyses of cases mainly relating to torts, privacy and human rights. Criminal law is absent. 

As much an argument as a disquisition, and full of amusing asides, it pulls no punches about the danger of judicial activism which is rife in both jurisdictions. Almost every page is thought-provoking and contentious. The main thesis is that in England, beginning with the case of Donoghue v Stephenson in 1932 (‘the year of the snail’ as Arnheim calls it), legal principle has been increasingly sacrificed to judicial law-making.

The issue of judicial encroachment into the sovereignty of parliament

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll