header-logo header-logo

Book review: Anglo-American Law: A Comparison

12 August 2020 / Harry Potter
Categories: Features , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail
"As much an argument as a disquisition, and full of amusing asides, it pulls no punches about the danger of judicial activism..."

Author: Michael Arnheim
Publisher: Talbot Publishing
ISBN: 9781616196325
Price: £70 hb, £7.98 ebook

From the author of The US Constitution for Dummies, this book is in similar vein and covers some of the same material. It provides a comparative overview of the legal systems in England and America, accompanied by many analyses of cases mainly relating to torts, privacy and human rights. Criminal law is absent. 

As much an argument as a disquisition, and full of amusing asides, it pulls no punches about the danger of judicial activism which is rife in both jurisdictions. Almost every page is thought-provoking and contentious. The main thesis is that in England, beginning with the case of Donoghue v Stephenson in 1932 (‘the year of the snail’ as Arnheim calls it), legal principle has been increasingly sacrificed to judicial law-making.

The issue of judicial encroachment into the sovereignty of parliament is

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll