header-logo header-logo

16 January 2015 / Roger Smith
Issue: 7636 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Book review: The First Miscarriage of Justice: The “Unreported and Amazing” Case of Tony Stock

bookreview_0_0

"The story is compelling & Jon Robins tells it well"

Author: Jon Robins
Publisher: Waterside Press
ISBN: 9781909976122
Price: £18

The title of this book comes from its subject himself. Tony Stock never meant to deny the long and sad trail of miscarriages of justice that plague British history. He wanted to argue that his case should be seen as the first in the modern series of miscarriages that began to be uncovered through the 1980s and 1990s, notably the Guildford Four, Cardiff Three and the Birmingham Six. Unlike the defendants in those cases, the injustice in Stock’s conviction has never been officially acknowledged.

The events that gave rise to the original conviction in 1970 lasted a couple of minutes. Two men collecting the takings of the day from a Tesco in Leeds are coshed from behind; one of them, the manager, refuses to let go of a cardboard box containing £4,000; one of the two assailants stamps on his hand, breaking two

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll