header-logo header-logo

29 July 2019 / Alec Samuels
Categories: Features , Profession , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Judicial Leadership: A New Strategic Approach (Book review)

“Society is changing, requiring adaptation and resilience on the part of the judiciary”
  • Authors: Sir Ernest Ryder and Stephen Hardy
  • Publisher: Oxford University Press
  • IBSN: 9780198829331
  • Pages: 240
  • RRP: £39.99

There was a time when an able and experienced QC became a judge, sat in court, sorted out the relevance and credibility problems in the evidence, ruled on any disputes in law, and gave his ultimate decision, usually sound; and went home. Not anymore. No longer is judging no more than an art, practised by those with requisite experience and a natural talent. Judging has also become a science.

The change principally has come about through the Constitutional Reform Act 2005. The role of the lord chancellor virtually disappeared, the lord chief justice became the head of the judiciary, and the senior president of tribunals became the head of the tribunals. The judges—over 5,000 of them—have taken over a significant administrative and management role as well as the judging role in the courts,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll