header-logo header-logo

Book review: Wrongful allegations of sexual and child abuse

10 March 2017
Issue: 7737 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail
nlj_7737_backpage

"This book is also interesting and nuanced on the subject of 'recovered memory'”

Editor: Ros Burnett
Publisher: Oxford University Press
ISBN: 9780198723301
​Price: £75

This book is a collection of essays by legal, scientific, academic and journalistic contributors looking at wrongful allegations of sex abuse. “Wrongful allegations” are defined to include all allegations which are factually untrue, ranging from the deliberately malicious to those which are honestly made but in reality mistaken or exaggerated. While stating that any attempt to assess the prevalence of wrongful allegations would be “wildly speculative”, the book nonetheless claims to highlight a range of factors “which make it more likely that the true prevalence of wrongful abuse allegations is much greater than is typically claimed in discourse on child abuse and rape”.

The “satanic panic”

I approached this book—and the often emotive debate surrounding it—as a lawyer who represents genuine victims of sexual abuse, but who also represented children wrongly implicated in the “satanic panic” of the early 1990s (on reaching adulthood, some of those children

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Partner hire bolstersprivate capital and global aviation finance offering

Morae—Carla Mendy

Morae—Carla Mendy

Digital and business solutions firm appoints chief operating officer

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Set welcomes two experienced juniors as new tenants

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll