header-logo header-logo

02 October 2014
Issue: 7624 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-detail

Boost for equal pay audits

New powers for employment tribunals to order employers to carry out equal pay audits are now in force.

Since 1 October, an order can be made where an employer is found to have breached equal pay law or sexually discriminated in non-contractual pay such as bonuses. The audit results can be made public and employers could face a fine of up to £5,000 for failure to comply with the tribunals’ requests.

According to Simons Muirhead & Burton, new businesses and very small businesses will be exempt from this power, and audits are unlikely to be ordered where they have already occurred in the last three years and there is no reason to think other breaches may have occurred.

Also since 1 October, employers have to grant expectant fathers or the partner of a pregnant woman unpaid time off work to attend up to antenatal classes.

Meanwhile, the national minimum wage hourly rates increase to £6.50 for adults, £5.13 for workers between 18 and 20 years, £3.79 for under-18s and £2.73 for apprentices. Employers who are found to be in breach can incur a financial penalty up to £20,000.

The two-year minimum qualifying period for unfair dismissal is abolished where the application is connected with the employee’s membership of the Reserve Forces. The secretary of state may make payments to compensate small and medium sized employers of reservists who are called to serve.

Emily Chalkley, associate at Charles Russell, said the rule change for reservists was designed to “encourage recruits”, but that “in practice reservists are likely to continue to bring their cases before a reinstatement committee because there are no fees associated with bringing a claim, unlike the employment tribunal who introduced fees earlier this year”.

Issue: 7624 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Elborne Mitchell & Myton Law

Weightmans—Elborne Mitchell & Myton Law

Firm expands in London and Leeds with dual merger

Boodle Hatfield—Clare Pooley & Michael Duffy

Boodle Hatfield—Clare Pooley & Michael Duffy

Private wealth and real estate firmpromotes two to partner and five to senior associate

Constantine Law—James Baker & Julie Goodway

Constantine Law—James Baker & Julie Goodway

Agile firm expands employment team with two partner hires

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll