header-logo header-logo

17 February 2017 / Michelle Barron
Issue: 7734 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Boosting costs recovery

Michelle Barron highlights the top eight costs mistakes law firms make, with suggested remedies

The legal sector is unique in the complexity and contentious nature of the calculation and recovery of costs. It is routine for considerable time, effort and frequently litigation to be required to recover costs.

As an experienced costs lawyer, I see common and recurring mistakes, many of which can hamper costs recovery and lead to significant write-offs and adverse costs orders. The impact on cash flow, profitability and resilience in a difficult sector can be immense. But many mistakes are not technical in nature, and can be avoided with minimal time and effort.

1. Delay

Healthy cash flow is the lifeblood of any successful business. The process of costs recovery must be started at the earliest opportunity.

Costs lawyers regularly receive files where there is an entitlement to costs but no action has been taken to recover them. In some cases, several years may have elapsed since the entitlement arose. The reasons for delay vary, but a systematic failure to manage lock-up

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll