header-logo header-logo

17 February 2017 / Michelle Barron
Issue: 7734 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Boosting costs recovery

Michelle Barron highlights the top eight costs mistakes law firms make, with suggested remedies

The legal sector is unique in the complexity and contentious nature of the calculation and recovery of costs. It is routine for considerable time, effort and frequently litigation to be required to recover costs.

As an experienced costs lawyer, I see common and recurring mistakes, many of which can hamper costs recovery and lead to significant write-offs and adverse costs orders. The impact on cash flow, profitability and resilience in a difficult sector can be immense. But many mistakes are not technical in nature, and can be avoided with minimal time and effort.

1. Delay

Healthy cash flow is the lifeblood of any successful business. The process of costs recovery must be started at the earliest opportunity.

Costs lawyers regularly receive files where there is an entitlement to costs but no action has been taken to recover them. In some cases, several years may have elapsed since the entitlement arose. The reasons for delay vary, but a systematic failure to manage lock-up

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Walkers—Muriel Marseille

Walkers—Muriel Marseille

Ashurst's Chief Risk Officer joins Walkers

Excello Law—John Osborne

Excello Law—John Osborne

Northern family lawyer John Osborne joins Excello

mfg Solicitors—Rebecca Rogers, Kennedy Langley & Victoria Griffiths

mfg Solicitors—Rebecca Rogers, Kennedy Langley & Victoria Griffiths

Trio of promotions announced at Kidderminster law firm mfg Solicitors

NEWS
A sole director can conspire with their own company for the purposes of the tort of unlawful means conspiracy, the High Court has ruled in a judgment with potentially wide implications for business disputes
The Court of Appeal has reinforced that domicile depends on intention rather than residence alone, in a significant post-Brexit ruling on cross-border financial remedy claims
The Chancery Division's long history comes to an end this autumn as it is reborn as the Business and Property Division, prompting questions over whether the shake-up is really necessary
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) continues to show that failing to disclose regulatory issues can attract harsher consequences than the original misconduct itself
Rejecting a generous settlement can prove an expensive mistake, as two recent high-profile cases demonstrate
back-to-top-scroll