header-logo header-logo

19 March 2009
Issue: 7361 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-detail

Booth to tackle banks

Employment

Employment barrister Cherie Booth QC is to join the legal team fighting a class action against RBS in the US courts.

US law firm Coughlin Stoia has drafted in Booth as a special adviser to pension funds representing local authority workers in North Yorkshire and Merseyside, which claim RBS “falsely reassured” investors that the bank was well-capitalised.

Peter Murphy, partner and litigation specialist at Sackers, the specialist pension law firm, says: “Although public details of the claim are limited at this stage, the historic caution of UK pension funds to become lead plaintiffs in US securities litigation suggests that those involved here are confident of the merits of the claim and have a significant amount at stake.

“The US legal system is an ideal forum for these types of claims. US lawyers act on a ‘no win, no fee’ basis and plaintiffs do not have to pay for the other side’s legal costs even if they lose. It is, of course, also based on US securities’ legislation.

“Cherie Booth’s involvement in the case is surprising. Her profile is mainly in UK and European human rights law, not US securities litigation. But that is not to say she doesn’t have relevant expertise.

“It is simply that she is likely to be just one part of a large legal team bringing with it a variety of skills and knowledge. Her involvement in the case will certainly add greater public interest to an already high-profile media event.”

Issue: 7361 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll