header-logo header-logo

01 April 2022 / Jason McCue
Issue: 7973 / Categories: Features , Profession , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Brand GB—Little Britain v Great Britain?

77188
The UK should harness the full potential of its legal system to put the ‘great’ back in Great Britain, says Jason McCue

Brexit will test the case as to whether we are Little Britain or Great Britain on the international stage. Alone, without the comfort of the EU, exacerbated by the global pandemic, the overwhelming necessity for our cultural and financial survival lies in our continued ability to attract others with Brand GB: to pull foreign trade, business, and investment in and push the UK out. We are in for the fight of our lives; the economic battleground centres on us retaining influence, power, knowledge, and innovation outside the collective security of the EU.

Jewel in the crown

This should cause us to reflect on what is our ‘greatness’—our appeal—and then maximise how we positively best exploit it. We should consider such before blindly playing our hand—wildly throwing hope on star performers, new trade deals or selling the silverware. Our greatness is based on our history, culture, and institutions,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll