header-logo header-logo

14 March 2019 / David Burrows
Issue: 7832 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Breakdown cover

Child support: David Burrows provides a master class in family law & administration law

  • Kafka, Dicey and a child support scheme.

The 25th anniversary of the opening of the doors of the Child Support Agency (now Child Maintenance Service (CMS)) was recorded, with no enthusiasm on my part, by ‘Going separate ways’ 168 NLJ 7790, p9. The Department for Work and Pensions presides over a Kafkaesque scheme. For example, it hopelessly delays necessary enforcement and needlessly involves five different courts and tribunals:

  • magistrates’ courts civil jurisdiction (eg committal for enforcement of arrears);
  • the family court (eg lump sum deduction orders);
  • the county court (charging orders: arrears);
  • first-tier tribunals; and
  • the upper tribunal (‘administrative’ appeals (to be explained in Pt 2 of this article).
  •  

    Beyond this are rights to appeal: to the High Court, Family Division, to the Court of Appeal and to the Supreme Court (with permission). Alongside this is judicial review, often the only means of challenge to child support delegated legislation and CMS civil servant decision-making

    If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
    If you are already a subscriber sign in
    ...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

    MOVERS & SHAKERS

    Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

    Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

    Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

    Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

    Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

    Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

    Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

    Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

    Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

    NEWS
    Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
    The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
    From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

    Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

    How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
    back-to-top-scroll