header-logo header-logo

14 March 2019 / David Burrows
Issue: 7832 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Breakdown cover

Child support: David Burrows provides a master class in family law & administration law

  • Kafka, Dicey and a child support scheme.

The 25th anniversary of the opening of the doors of the Child Support Agency (now Child Maintenance Service (CMS)) was recorded, with no enthusiasm on my part, by ‘Going separate ways’ 168 NLJ 7790, p9. The Department for Work and Pensions presides over a Kafkaesque scheme. For example, it hopelessly delays necessary enforcement and needlessly involves five different courts and tribunals:

  • magistrates’ courts civil jurisdiction (eg committal for enforcement of arrears);
  • the family court (eg lump sum deduction orders);
  • the county court (charging orders: arrears);
  • first-tier tribunals; and
  • the upper tribunal (‘administrative’ appeals (to be explained in Pt 2 of this article).
  •  

    Beyond this are rights to appeal: to the High Court, Family Division, to the Court of Appeal and to the Supreme Court (with permission). Alongside this is judicial review, often the only means of challenge to child support delegated legislation and CMS civil servant decision-making

    If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
    If you are already a subscriber sign in
    ...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

    MOVERS & SHAKERS

    Ward Hadaway—19 promotions

    Ward Hadaway—19 promotions

    19 promotions across national offices, including two new partners

    Brabners—Ruth Hargreaves

    Brabners—Ruth Hargreaves

    Partner promoted to head of corporate team

    Slater Heelis—Liam Hall, Jordan Bear & Joe Madigan

    Slater Heelis—Liam Hall, Jordan Bear & Joe Madigan

    Chester office expansion accelerates with triple appointment

    NEWS
    As AI chatbots increasingly provide legal and commercial advice, English law is beginning to confront who should bear responsibility when automated systems get things wrong
    Businesses are facing a ‘dramatic rise in prosecution risks’ as sweeping reforms to corporate criminal liability come into force, expanding the net of who can be held responsible for wrongdoing inside organisations
    The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has reignited debate over what exactly counts as the ‘conduct of litigation’ in modern legal practice
    A controversial High Court financial remedies ruling has reignited debate over secrecy, non-disclosure and fairness in divorce proceedings involving hidden wealth
    Britain’s deferred prosecution agreement regime is undergoing a significant shift, with prosecutors placing renewed emphasis on corporate cooperation, reform and early self-reporting
    back-to-top-scroll