header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

Going separate ways

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
27 April 2018 / David Burrows
Issue: 7790 / Categories: Features , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail
nlj_7790_burrows_carousel

David Burrows laments the unnecessary & harmful complexities of the child support scheme

  • Why a child support scheme and how has it developed over the years?
  • Assessment of child support maintenance by a formula, developed by departure (now variation) directions.
  • What of the rights of the child for whom payments are made?

On 3 April 1993 the Child Support Agency opened its doors for business. 25 years later, it has undergone three major amendments of the original Child Support Act 1991(CSA 1991), namely in 1995, 2000 and 2008. It has had various shifts of name and nominal administrator (under the Child Maintenance and Other Payments Act 2008 the Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission took over from the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, only to cede the work back to the Secretary of State, who has since then worked through Child Support Agency (again) and now Child Maintenance Service).

It remains technically and legislatively as dense a scheme as ever. Most parents are unrepresented, legal aid is rare (eg for the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
DWF—19 appointments

DWF—19 appointments

Belfast team bolstered by three senior hires and 16 further appointments

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Firm strengthens leveraged finance team with London partner hire

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Double hire marks launch of family team in Leeds

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Small firms call for tech clarity as AI looms
Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Traders’ convictions quashed in Libor shock
The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
NLJ this week: Fraud claims climb as courts brace for AI threats
Charlie Mercer and Astrid Gillam of Stewarts crunch the numbers on civil fraud claims in the English courts, in this week's NLJ. New data shows civil fraud claims rising steadily since 2014, with the King’s Bench Division overtaking the Commercial Court as the forum of choice for lower-value disputes
NLJ this week: Pro bono power without the red tape
Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre makes the case for ‘General Practice Pro Bono’—using core legal skills to deliver life-changing support, without the need for niche expertise—in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Trans pool player loses discrimination fight
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve reports on Haynes v Thomson, the first judicial application of the Supreme Court’s For Women Scotland ruling in a discrimination claim, in this week's NLJ
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll