header-logo header-logo

06 July 2012 / Malcolm Dowden , Emma Humphreys
Issue: 7521 / Categories: Features , Property , Technology
printer mail-detail

Breaking the code

Emma Humphreys & Malcolm Dowden dissect the recent Law Commission e-comms code consultation

The Law Commission’s consultation paper based on its initial review of the electronic communications code (the code) makes some substantive proposals for change, but also raises several questions and calls for information from practitioners.

Actual reform remains a distant prospect. There is no realistic chance of change until at least 2015. Consequently, while practitioners ought to take the opportunity to contribute to the reform process, the paper has a more immediate practical use since it isolates points on which the code is unclear and possibly unworkable in its current form. Consequently, it provides practitioners with a crisp and direct means to navigate through the complex drafting and often questionable logic of the code when advising clients on current matters.

Private enterprise, public benefit

The Commission considers that a court order made under the code to dispense with the need for agreement to the installation of electronic communications apparatus must engage human rights issues: specifically, protection of private

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll