header-logo header-logo

06 July 2012 / Malcolm Dowden , Emma Humphreys
Issue: 7521 / Categories: Features , Property , Technology
printer mail-detail

Breaking the code

Emma Humphreys & Malcolm Dowden dissect the recent Law Commission e-comms code consultation

The Law Commission’s consultation paper based on its initial review of the electronic communications code (the code) makes some substantive proposals for change, but also raises several questions and calls for information from practitioners.

Actual reform remains a distant prospect. There is no realistic chance of change until at least 2015. Consequently, while practitioners ought to take the opportunity to contribute to the reform process, the paper has a more immediate practical use since it isolates points on which the code is unclear and possibly unworkable in its current form. Consequently, it provides practitioners with a crisp and direct means to navigate through the complex drafting and often questionable logic of the code when advising clients on current matters.

Private enterprise, public benefit

The Commission considers that a court order made under the code to dispense with the need for agreement to the installation of electronic communications apparatus must engage human rights issues: specifically, protection of private

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Jasmine Olomolaiye, Foot Anstey

NLJ Career Profile: Jasmine Olomolaiye, Foot Anstey

Jasmine Olomolaiye, partner at national law firm Foot Anstey, discusses the power of reading and the dizzying heights of her dream career

Freeths—Christopher Stephens

Freeths—Christopher Stephens

Strategic land specialist joins real estate practice as partner

Shakespeare Martineau—Jonathan Pawlowski

Shakespeare Martineau—Jonathan Pawlowski

Construction practice strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Family law must shift from conflict-driven litigation to child-centred problem-solving, according to a major new report. Writing in NLJ this week, Caroline Bowden of Anthony Gold outlines findings showing overwhelming support for reform, with 92% agreeing lawyers owe duties to children as well as clients
back-to-top-scroll