header-logo header-logo

11 September 2009 / Martin Baldock
Issue: 7384 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness
printer mail-detail

Breaking through

Martin Baldock explains how a forensic expert cuts through electronic “fog”

Judges, counsel and board-level decision makers could be forgiven for being bewildered by experts telling them what can or cannot be done with technology. The pace of IT development is such that it is easy to be hoodwinked.

In a court of law this IT “innocence” becomes critical as those involved in cases and those hearing them risk falling victim to tactical assertions about electronic evidence.

Electronic evidence is increasingly at the heart of litigation today. This e-evidence can be gathered from desktop and laptop computers, mobile phones, BlackBerrys and even satellite navigation systems.

UK courts are beginning to experience the kind of tactical use of electronic evidence long seen in US courts with counsel arguing that information cannot be recovered or that, given the estimated value of the case being heard, it is not worth the expense involved in taking the e-disclosure process to another level.

This is where the evidence of the forensic expert witness becomes essential in cutting through obfuscation to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll