header-logo header-logo

11 September 2009 / Martin Baldock
Issue: 7384 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness
printer mail-detail

Breaking through

Martin Baldock explains how a forensic expert cuts through electronic “fog”

Judges, counsel and board-level decision makers could be forgiven for being bewildered by experts telling them what can or cannot be done with technology. The pace of IT development is such that it is easy to be hoodwinked.

In a court of law this IT “innocence” becomes critical as those involved in cases and those hearing them risk falling victim to tactical assertions about electronic evidence.

Electronic evidence is increasingly at the heart of litigation today. This e-evidence can be gathered from desktop and laptop computers, mobile phones, BlackBerrys and even satellite navigation systems.

UK courts are beginning to experience the kind of tactical use of electronic evidence long seen in US courts with counsel arguing that information cannot be recovered or that, given the estimated value of the case being heard, it is not worth the expense involved in taking the e-disclosure process to another level.

This is where the evidence of the forensic expert witness becomes essential in cutting through obfuscation to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll