header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
11 July 2013 / Deborah Caldwell
Issue: 7568 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

A breakthrough?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Deborah Caldwell examines developments surrounding tenants’ break rights & recovery of overpayments

After a seemingly endless run of landlord-friendly decisions on break rights, the High Court has finally delivered a judgment in favour of tenants (Marks and Spencer Plc v BNP Paribas Security Services Trust Company (Jersey) Ltd [2013] EWHC 1279 (Ch), [2013] All ER (D) 214 (May)).

Background

Over the past couple of years, tenants have encountered difficulties exercising break rights where the specified date for termination of the lease has fallen in the middle of a rent quarter. On the quarter day before the break date, the tenant is obliged to pay a full quarter’s rent. That was made abundantly clear in QuirkCo Investments Ltd v Aspray Transport Ltd [2011] EWHC 3060 (Ch) and more recently in Canonical UK Ltd v TST Millbank LLC [2012] EWHC 3710 (Ch), [2013] All ER (D) 50 (Feb).

Where a tenant has successfully exercised its break right, the issue then becomes one of whether it can recover any “overpayments” it has made, meaning that part

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Partner and Manchester office lead appointed head of family

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

DWF insurance services director appointed to Civil Justice Council

R3—Jodie Wildridge

R3—Jodie Wildridge

Kings Chambers barrister appointed chair of R3 Yorkshire

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Renters’ Rights revolution begins—brace for tribunal chaos

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

NLJ this week: Civil procedure gets a spring overhaul
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
NLJ this week: Why GP complaints are going nowhere
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
NLJ this week: Prenups meet a jurisdictional brick wall
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
NLJ this week: Has Rylands v Fletcher come back from the dead?
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll