header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
11 July 2013 / Deborah Caldwell
Issue: 7568 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

A breakthrough?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Deborah Caldwell examines developments surrounding tenants’ break rights & recovery of overpayments

After a seemingly endless run of landlord-friendly decisions on break rights, the High Court has finally delivered a judgment in favour of tenants (Marks and Spencer Plc v BNP Paribas Security Services Trust Company (Jersey) Ltd [2013] EWHC 1279 (Ch), [2013] All ER (D) 214 (May)).

Background

Over the past couple of years, tenants have encountered difficulties exercising break rights where the specified date for termination of the lease has fallen in the middle of a rent quarter. On the quarter day before the break date, the tenant is obliged to pay a full quarter’s rent. That was made abundantly clear in QuirkCo Investments Ltd v Aspray Transport Ltd [2011] EWHC 3060 (Ch) and more recently in Canonical UK Ltd v TST Millbank LLC [2012] EWHC 3710 (Ch), [2013] All ER (D) 50 (Feb).

Where a tenant has successfully exercised its break right, the issue then becomes one of whether it can recover any “overpayments” it has made, meaning that part

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll