header-logo header-logo

Brexit: contingency plans required

06 April 2017
Issue: 7741 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The government needs to set out its contingency planning in the event of its not achieving a deal with the EU by the end of the negotiating period, MPs have warned.

The cross-party Exiting the EU Committee, chaired by Hilary Benn MP, this week called for an economic and legal assessment of the situation should the UK fall back on World Trade Organisation (WTO) rules. Its report, The government’s negotiating objectives: the White Paper, states that the government’s assertion that “no deal is better than a bad deal” is unsubstantiated.

Benn said: “Falling back on WTO terms would mean not just a return to tariffs, but the reappearance of non-tariff barriers.

“That would mean more paperwork, border checks and bureaucratic requirements for British companies trading with the EU. For many businesses these can be far more costly than the actual tariff itself.”

The report also calls on the government to prioritise obtaining clarity on whether the UK can continue to trade with non-EU countries through the more than 50 free trade agreements that it is party to through the EU.

Issue: 7741 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll