header-logo header-logo

24 January 2019 / David Greene
Issue: 7825 / Categories: Opinion , Brexit , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Brexit conundrums

The rejection of the prime minister’s proposals means we are in uncharted territory constitutionally, says David Greene

All the Brexit noise is drowning out the substantial constitutional challenges and changes that the government and Parliament are working through in the Brexit process. One of the main challenges seeks a complete reversal of our constitutional machinery.

Famously (or, for some, infamously), the UK has a largely unwritten constitution, but is probably better described as uncodified since some parts are written. A codified constitution establishes broad principles but, even in its presence, much of the democratic process relies upon unwritten commitments on the part of all stakeholders to the institutions of democracy. In many parts of the world, that commitment is challenged.

The UK democratic process works on the basis that the elected government proposes and Parliament dispenses. The government introduces draft legislation and Parliament decides whether to amend the draft and/or pass the legislation into statute. Amendments can make substantial change to legislation but cannot effectively wreck it. Similarly, the government proposes an annual budget

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
back-to-top-scroll