header-logo header-logo

Brexit conundrums

24 January 2019 / David Greene
Issue: 7825 / Categories: Opinion , Brexit , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail
The rejection of the prime minister’s proposals means we are in uncharted territory constitutionally, says David Greene

All the Brexit noise is drowning out the substantial constitutional challenges and changes that the government and Parliament are working through in the Brexit process. One of the main challenges seeks a complete reversal of our constitutional machinery.

Famously (or, for some, infamously), the UK has a largely unwritten constitution, but is probably better described as uncodified since some parts are written. A codified constitution establishes broad principles but, even in its presence, much of the democratic process relies upon unwritten commitments on the part of all stakeholders to the institutions of democracy. In many parts of the world, that commitment is challenged.

The UK democratic process works on the basis that the elected government proposes and Parliament dispenses. The government introduces draft legislation and Parliament decides whether to amend the draft and/or pass the legislation into statute. Amendments can make substantial change to legislation but cannot effectively wreck it. Similarly, the government proposes an annual budget

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Phoebe Gogarty

Muckle LLP—Phoebe Gogarty

North East firm welcomes employment specialist

Browne Jacobson—Colette Withey

Browne Jacobson—Colette Withey

Partner joins commercial and technology practice

Ellisons—Lizzy Firmin

Ellisons—Lizzy Firmin

Chief operating officer joins equity partnership

NEWS
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold dives into the quirks of civil practice, from the Court of Appeal’s fierce defence of form N510 to fresh reminders about compliance and interest claims, in this week's Civil Way
In this week's NLJ, Sophie Houghton of LexisPSL distils the key lesson from recent costs cases: if you want to exceed guideline hourly rates (GHR), you must prove why
With chronic underfunding and rising demand leaving thousands without legal help, technology could transform access to justice—if handled wisely, writes Professor Sue Prince of the University of Exeter in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) has restated a fundamental truth, writes John Gould, chair of Russell-Cooke, in this week's NLJ: only authorised persons can conduct litigation. The decision sparked alarm, but Gould stresses it merely confirms the Legal Services Act 2007
The government’s decision to make the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) the Single Professional Services Supervisor marks a watershed in the UK’s fight against money laundering, says Rebecca Hughes of Corker Binning in this week's NLJ. The FCA will now oversee 60,000 firms across legal and accountancy sectors—a massive expansion of remit that raises questions over resources and readiness 
back-to-top-scroll