header-logo header-logo

Brexit conundrums

24 January 2019 / David Greene
Issue: 7825 / Categories: Opinion , Brexit , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail
The rejection of the prime minister’s proposals means we are in uncharted territory constitutionally, says David Greene

All the Brexit noise is drowning out the substantial constitutional challenges and changes that the government and Parliament are working through in the Brexit process. One of the main challenges seeks a complete reversal of our constitutional machinery.

Famously (or, for some, infamously), the UK has a largely unwritten constitution, but is probably better described as uncodified since some parts are written. A codified constitution establishes broad principles but, even in its presence, much of the democratic process relies upon unwritten commitments on the part of all stakeholders to the institutions of democracy. In many parts of the world, that commitment is challenged.

The UK democratic process works on the basis that the elected government proposes and Parliament dispenses. The government introduces draft legislation and Parliament decides whether to amend the draft and/or pass the legislation into statute. Amendments can make substantial change to legislation but cannot effectively wreck it. Similarly, the government proposes an annual budget

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—Michael Conway

Birketts—Michael Conway

IP partner joins team in Bristol to lead branding and trade marks practice

Blake Morgan—Daniel Church

Blake Morgan—Daniel Church

Succession and tax team welcomes partner inLondon

Maguire Family Law—Jennifer Hudec

Maguire Family Law—Jennifer Hudec

Firm appoints senior associate to lead Manchester city centre team

NEWS
Ministers’ proposals to raise funds by seizing interest on lawyers’ client account schemes could ‘cause firms to close’, solicitors have warned
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
Pension sharing orders (PSOs) have quietly reached their 25th anniversary, yet remain stubbornly underused. Writing in NLJ this week, Joanna Newton of Stowe Family Law argues that this neglect risks long-term financial harm, particularly for women
A school ski trip, a confiscated phone and an unauthorised hotel-room entry culminated in a pupil’s permanent exclusion. In this week's issue of NLJ, Nicholas Dobson charts how the Court of Appeal upheld the decision despite acknowledged procedural flaws
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
back-to-top-scroll