header-logo header-logo

16 February 2017 / Francis Kendall
Issue: 7735 / Categories: Features , Brexit , Procedure & practice , EU , Costs , Budgeting
printer mail-detail

Brexit & currency flip-flops in court

Francis Kendall considers the impact of the falling pound on costs awards to European litigants

    • Successful overseas parties may well try their arm in UK courts as Brexit uncertainty continues.

    Here’s something that voters somehow overlooked when casting their ballots in the EU referendum last year: the impact the subsequently falling pound would have on costs awards to European litigants.

    It’s impossible to say whether this could have tipped the balance in favour of remain, and it is equally difficult to predict what the courts are going to do about it.

    This novel issue has come up twice in the High Court in the last couple of months, and unhelpfully the judges have gone in different directions.

    Elkamet

    In Elkamet Kunststofftechnik GmbH v Saint-Gobain Glass France S.A. [2016] EWHC 3421 (Pat)—involving a successful German claimant—the court was asked to make an additional costs order due to the decline in the

    If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
    If you are already a subscriber sign in
    ...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

    MOVERS & SHAKERS

    NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

    NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

    Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

    Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

    Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

    Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

    Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

    Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

    Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

    NEWS
    Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
    The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
    Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
    Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
    The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
    back-to-top-scroll