header-logo header-logo

16 February 2017 / Francis Kendall
Issue: 7735 / Categories: Features , Brexit , Procedure & practice , EU , Costs , Budgeting
printer mail-detail

Brexit & currency flip-flops in court

Francis Kendall considers the impact of the falling pound on costs awards to European litigants

    • Successful overseas parties may well try their arm in UK courts as Brexit uncertainty continues.

    Here’s something that voters somehow overlooked when casting their ballots in the EU referendum last year: the impact the subsequently falling pound would have on costs awards to European litigants.

    It’s impossible to say whether this could have tipped the balance in favour of remain, and it is equally difficult to predict what the courts are going to do about it.

    This novel issue has come up twice in the High Court in the last couple of months, and unhelpfully the judges have gone in different directions.

    Elkamet

    In Elkamet Kunststofftechnik GmbH v Saint-Gobain Glass France S.A. [2016] EWHC 3421 (Pat)—involving a successful German claimant—the court was asked to make an additional costs order due to the decline in the

    If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
    If you are already a subscriber sign in
    ...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

    MOVERS & SHAKERS

    Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

    Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

    Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

    Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

    Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

    Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

    Lime Solicitors—four promotions

    Lime Solicitors—four promotions

    Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

    NEWS
    The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
    A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
    Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
    Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
    Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
    back-to-top-scroll