header-logo header-logo

16 February 2017 / Francis Kendall
Issue: 7735 / Categories: Features , Brexit , Procedure & practice , EU , Costs , Budgeting
printer mail-detail

Brexit & currency flip-flops in court

Francis Kendall considers the impact of the falling pound on costs awards to European litigants

    • Successful overseas parties may well try their arm in UK courts as Brexit uncertainty continues.

    Here’s something that voters somehow overlooked when casting their ballots in the EU referendum last year: the impact the subsequently falling pound would have on costs awards to European litigants.

    It’s impossible to say whether this could have tipped the balance in favour of remain, and it is equally difficult to predict what the courts are going to do about it.

    This novel issue has come up twice in the High Court in the last couple of months, and unhelpfully the judges have gone in different directions.

    Elkamet

    In Elkamet Kunststofftechnik GmbH v Saint-Gobain Glass France S.A. [2016] EWHC 3421 (Pat)—involving a successful German claimant—the court was asked to make an additional costs order due to the decline in the

    If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
    If you are already a subscriber sign in
    ...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

    MOVERS & SHAKERS

    Ogier—Martin Livingston

    Ogier—Martin Livingston

    Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

    Blake Morgan—47 promotions

    Blake Morgan—47 promotions

    Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

    NEWS
    Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
    Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
    From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
    Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
    County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
    back-to-top-scroll