header-logo header-logo

Brexit & devolution

15 June 2016
Issue: 7703 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-detail

EU referendum: consequences of “leave” vote for NI & Wales

Lawyers are keeping a close eye on the polls in the run-up to next week’s EU Referendum, with the latest YouGov survey showing Brexit in the lead with 46% to Remain’s 39%.

While Brexit would have a huge impact on business and government across the UK, the repercussions for Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales would be unique. The Scots, of course, could press for a second referendum and ultimately leave the UK, although their ultimate relationship with the EU is impossible to predict.

For Northern Ireland, one of the main changes would be a “hardening” of the border with the Republic of Ireland. Writing in NLJ this week, Fionnuala Connolly, 4-5 Gray’s Inn Square, says: “In the event of Brexit, it is entirely foreseeable that [the higher courts in Northern Ireland] may be faced with novel legal disputes relating to entry at the land border and indeed residence in the UK.” Connolly also anticipates changes to the functions of the British-Irish Council, particularly in EU law-related areas such as trade or animal disease controls.

Wales received about £245m more from the EU than it paid in, in 2014, according to research by Cardiff University, so the Welsh have a lot to lose in the event of Brexit. The National Assembly is limited in the extent to which it can defend Welsh interests as it has legislative competence only where specifically conferred by Westminster statute. Given that the National Assembly will therefore be dependent on Westminster to make up the funding shortfall post-Brexit, therefore, “an exit strategy that does not properly accommodate Welsh interest may trigger calls for greater devolution,” writes Catherine Grubb, Civitas Law, in this week’s NLJ.

She points out that the impact of Brexit on Wales depends on what is negotiated between Westminster and Cardiff as much as between the UK, EU and the rest of the world.

Issue: 7703 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll