header-logo header-logo

15 June 2016
Issue: 7703 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Brexit & devolution

EU referendum: consequences of “leave” vote for NI & Wales

Lawyers are keeping a close eye on the polls in the run-up to next week’s EU Referendum, with the latest YouGov survey showing Brexit in the lead with 46% to Remain’s 39%.

While Brexit would have a huge impact on business and government across the UK, the repercussions for Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales would be unique. The Scots, of course, could press for a second referendum and ultimately leave the UK, although their ultimate relationship with the EU is impossible to predict.

For Northern Ireland, one of the main changes would be a “hardening” of the border with the Republic of Ireland. Writing in NLJ this week, Fionnuala Connolly, 4-5 Gray’s Inn Square, says: “In the event of Brexit, it is entirely foreseeable that [the higher courts in Northern Ireland] may be faced with novel legal disputes relating to entry at the land border and indeed residence in the UK.” Connolly also anticipates changes to the functions of the British-Irish Council, particularly in EU law-related areas such as trade or animal disease controls.

Wales received about £245m more from the EU than it paid in, in 2014, according to research by Cardiff University, so the Welsh have a lot to lose in the event of Brexit. The National Assembly is limited in the extent to which it can defend Welsh interests as it has legislative competence only where specifically conferred by Westminster statute. Given that the National Assembly will therefore be dependent on Westminster to make up the funding shortfall post-Brexit, therefore, “an exit strategy that does not properly accommodate Welsh interest may trigger calls for greater devolution,” writes Catherine Grubb, Civitas Law, in this week’s NLJ.

She points out that the impact of Brexit on Wales depends on what is negotiated between Westminster and Cardiff as much as between the UK, EU and the rest of the world.

Issue: 7703 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll