header-logo header-logo

20 February 2019
Issue: 7829 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Brexit impact on sanctions

‘Significant divergence’ on the horizon

The impact of Brexit on UK sanctions laws could be ‘far-reaching’ and lead to more red tape for businesses in the future, a leading trade lawyer has warned.

Hogan Lovells partner Aline Doussin, who heads the firm’s UK trade team, said this week that the UK government, post-Brexit, will be able to adopt sanctions ‘separately and independently’ from what the EU does.

‘Going forward, one cannot exclude a significant divergence in the future of UK sanctions from what the EU will do on its own,’ she said in an article posted on Hogan Lovells’ website.

‘This could lead to additional compliance burdens for businesses and financial institutions, which will have to deal with multiple and increasingly complex sanctions regimes.’

In the past few weeks, secondary legislation has been put before Parliament to replace references in sanctions laws to member states and the EU with references to the UK, and to replace references to the competent authorities with references to the UK Treasury. This means existing aspects of the financial sanctions regimes against countries such as Afghanistan, Burma, Iran and Venezuela will continue.

Consequently, Doussin said, ‘we do not expect any gaps in implementing existing sanctions regimes’. Post-Brexit, the UK will be required by international law to implement UN sanctions in UK domestic law and will carry over all EU sanctions at the time of departure.

After that, however, the UK will ‘have the powers to adopt other sanctions under the Sanctions Act, separately and independently from what the EU does,’ Doussin said.

‘In this, the impact of Brexit on UK sanctions laws is far-reaching.’

Prime Minister Theresa May flew to Brussels this week for further talks with the European Commission and heads of EU member states, hoping to secure concessions over the backstop. However, EU leaders continue to emphasise that they will not renegotiate the withdrawal agreement.

Issue: 7829 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll