header-logo header-logo

Brexit: the final round (or two)?

22 May 2019 / David Greene
Issue: 7841 / Categories: Opinion , Brexit , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Formal constitutional upheaval can mask the vast amounts of work being undertaken on all sides to find a workable Brexit, says David Greene

I spend much time with European colleagues talking about Brexit. Many ask what is going to happen. They think that I have some greater insight than Theresa May. I suppose I might but it’s pure speculation. As practitioners we remain in a period of great uncertainty as do clients. Most have now taken steps to prepare for both a no deal Brexit or a deal with a transition period. Law firms are doing similarly and there is much happening below the surface.

Progress at home & abroad

The Labour Party has been pressing for a customs union and stipulated it as one of its preconditions to an agreement with the Government. Some assume that a customs union assists the profession (as distinct from its clients) but a simple customs union, like most free trade agreements, addresses goods rather than services. Further, the important Directives that regulate the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll