header-logo header-logo

22 April 2020 / Amanda Robinson , David Wolchover
Categories: Features , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Brexit, the Prime Minister & the Single Market

Amanda Robinson & David Wolchover contend that Boris Johnson was right―the UK must remain part of the Single Market

For the past four years, until very recently, Brexit has dominated politics and media in the UK and we now face an unknown number of years of continuing negotiations over trading arrangements as well as numerous other issues. As matters stand, however, there remains every prospect that the UK will end up with no deal since our government has expressed an evident desire to avoid what it regards as the millstone of EU regulations.

Early in February 2020, the Prime Minister said as much setting out the UK’s negotiating position: ‘There is no need for a free trade agreement to involve accepting EU rules on competition policy, subsidies, social protection, the environment, or anything similar any more than the EU should be obliged to accept UK rules,’ (https://www.reuters.com).).

This suggests two possibilities. Either the Conservative Government in reality want ‘no deal’ and are looking

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
In this week’s NLJ, Fred Philpott, Gough Square Chambers, invites us to imagine there was no statutory limitation. What would that world be like?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll