header-logo header-logo

Bridging the gap in property purchases

12 April 2024 / Tricia Hemans , Daniel Black
Issue: 8066 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Property
printer mail-detail
167828
The registration gap is a risky period in a property purchase. Tricia Hemans & Daniel Black explain how to avoid the pitfalls
  • Until a purchase has been registered, the buyer is not yet the legal owner of the property, even though they are the owner of the equity.
  • An equitable owner can exercise certain ‘owner’s powers’, but there are strict limitations as to what they can do with the property.
  • There are several steps a purchaser and their representatives can take to avoid problems during the registration gap.

The position of a purchaser during the registration gap can be a very precarious one indeed. Having exchanged contracts and executed a transfer, the purchaser is the equitable owner of the property. Yet until the transaction is completed by registration, they are not the owner at law (the Land Registration Act 2002 (LRA 2002), s 27(1)).

In the recent decision of the Upper Tribunal in R M Residential Ltd v Westacre Estates Ltd & Bellrise Designs Ltd [2024]

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll