header-logo header-logo

27 October 2016
Issue: 7720 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

British public overestimate legal costs

The British public avoid solicitors because they overestimate the cost of legal services, according to research commissioned by legal comparison website Law Superstore.

A mere nine percent of more than 2,000 consumers polled felt confident they knew the cost of common services such as conveyancing, wills, probate and divorce.

When asked to guess the average cost of legal services, the consumers substantially overestimated lawyers’ fees. The most popular estimates of average fees for divorce, probate and buying and selling a property were £2,300, £804 and £1,867. In fact, the correct figures are £722, £829 and £1,283, according to Legal Services Board data collected this year.

The research also showed people usually have a positive experience once they have engaged a lawyer. Some 71% secured a positive outcome and 58% felt supported.

Issue: 7720 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson appoints Vicky Tomlinson as Head of Independent Health and Care

DWF—five appointments

DWF—five appointments

DWF further strengthens major injury and casualty offering with new partner and four directors from DAC Beachcroft

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis strengthens Grimsby child care team

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll