header-logo header-logo

British public overestimate legal costs

27 October 2016
Issue: 7720 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The British public avoid solicitors because they overestimate the cost of legal services, according to research commissioned by legal comparison website Law Superstore.

A mere nine percent of more than 2,000 consumers polled felt confident they knew the cost of common services such as conveyancing, wills, probate and divorce.

When asked to guess the average cost of legal services, the consumers substantially overestimated lawyers’ fees. The most popular estimates of average fees for divorce, probate and buying and selling a property were £2,300, £804 and £1,867. In fact, the correct figures are £722, £829 and £1,283, according to Legal Services Board data collected this year.

The research also showed people usually have a positive experience once they have engaged a lawyer. Some 71% secured a positive outcome and 58% felt supported.

Issue: 7720 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll