header-logo header-logo

27 October 2016
Issue: 7720 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

British public overestimate legal costs

The British public avoid solicitors because they overestimate the cost of legal services, according to research commissioned by legal comparison website Law Superstore.

A mere nine percent of more than 2,000 consumers polled felt confident they knew the cost of common services such as conveyancing, wills, probate and divorce.

When asked to guess the average cost of legal services, the consumers substantially overestimated lawyers’ fees. The most popular estimates of average fees for divorce, probate and buying and selling a property were £2,300, £804 and £1,867. In fact, the correct figures are £722, £829 and £1,283, according to Legal Services Board data collected this year.

The research also showed people usually have a positive experience once they have engaged a lawyer. Some 71% secured a positive outcome and 58% felt supported.

Issue: 7720 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll