header-logo header-logo

31 March 2023 / Mark Pawlowski
Issue: 8019 / Categories: Features , Divorce , Family
printer mail-detail

Broken promises to marry: left at the alter

117253
For better or worse? Mark Pawlowski looks back on the options available to those on the end of a broken promise to marry

In her 2014 book Breach of promise to marry: a history of how jilted brides settled scores, Denise Bates writes:

‘While Dickens’s embittered spinster Miss Havisham stopped all her clocks on her wedding day and “never since looked upon the light of day”, the reality was much brighter for thousands of jilted women. The real Miss Havishams didn’t mope in faded wedding finery—they hired lawyers and struck the first “no win, no fee” deals to sue for breach of promise.’

Until 1970, breach of promise to marry was a common law tort under English law. There could be no action, however, unless a contract to marry had been made. No particular form of words was necessary, and the contract did not have to be evidenced in writing. Interestingly, however, the claim could not succeed unless the claimant’s testimony was corroborated by some other

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll